Clinical inertia in people with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study of more than 80,000 people

497Citations
Citations of this article
259Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE-To determine time to treatment intensification in people with type 2 diabetes treated with one, two, or three oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) and associated levels of glycemic control. RESEARCH DESIGNANDMETHODSdThis was a retrospective cohort study based on 81,573 people with type 2 diabetes in the U.K. Clinical Practice Research Datalink between January 2004 and December 2006, with follow-up until April 2011. RESULTS-In people with HbA1c ≥7.0, ≥7.5, or ≥8.0% (≥53, ≥58, or ≥64 mmol/mol), median time from above HbA1c cutoff to intensification with an additional OAD was 2.9, 1.9, or 1.6 years, respectively, for those taking one OAD and >7.2, >7.2, and >6.9 years for those taking two OADs. Median time to intensification with insulin was>7.1,>6.1, or 6.0 years for those taking one, two, or threeOADs.Mean HbA1c at intensificationwith anOADor insulin for people taking one, two, or threeOADs was 8.7, 9.1, and 9.7%. In patients taking one, two, or threeOADs,median time fromtreatment initiation to intensificationwith anOADor insulin exceeded themaximumfollow-up time of 7.2 years. The probability of patients with poor glycemic control taking one, two, or three OADs, intensifying at end of follow-up with an OAD, was 21.1-43.6% and with insulin 5.1-12.0%. CONCLUSIONS-There are delays in treatment intensification in peoplewith type 2 diabetes despite suboptimal glycemic control. A substantial proportion of people remain in poor glycemic control for several years before intensification with OADs and insulin. © 2013 by the American Diabetes Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khunti, K., Wolden, M. L., Thorsted, B. L., Andersen, M., & Davies, M. J. (2013). Clinical inertia in people with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study of more than 80,000 people. Diabetes Care, 36(11), 3411–3417. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-0331

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free