Coadaptation and conflict, misconception and muddle, in the evolution of genomic imprinting

  • Haig D
  • 88

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 27

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Common misconceptions of the 'parental conflict' theory of genomic imprinting are addressed. Contrary to widespread belief, the theory defines conditions for cooperation as well as conflict in mother-offspring relations. Moreover, conflict between genes of maternal and paternal origin is not the same as conflict between mothers and fathers. In theory, imprinting can evolve either because genes of maternal and paternal origin have divergent interests or because offspring benefit from a phenotypic match, or mismatch, to one or other parent. The latter class of models usually require maintenance of polymorphism at imprinted loci for the maintenance of imprinted expression. The conflict hypothesis does not require maintenance of polymorphism and is therefore a more plausible explanation of evolutionarily conserved imprinting.

Author-supplied keywords

  • coadaptation
  • epistasis
  • genomic imprinting
  • gestational drive
  • parent-offspring conflict

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

  • D. Haig

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free