Coercion through IOs: The security council and the logic of information transmission

  • Thompson A
  • 201


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 107


    Citations of this article.


Why do powerful states often channel coercive policies through inter- national organizations ~IOs!? The article explains this phenomenon by theorizing the political advantages of working through a neutral institution, defined as one with heterogeneous and representative member preferences+ The argument centers on the notion of strategic information transmission+ IO involvement sends information about the coercer’s intentions and the consequences of the coercive policy to foreign lead- ers and their publics, information that determines the level of international support offered to the coercing state+ The logic helps explain why the United Nations Secu- rity Council plays a unique role in approving and disapproving the use of force+ A case study of the 1990–91 GulfWar shows how these information transmission mech- anisms work in practice and that the rationalist information argument provides more traction than a legitimacy-based alternative explanation+

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Alexander Thompson

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free