Coevolutionary Dynamics of Cultural Markers, Parochial Cooperation, and Networks

5Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The emergence and institutionalization of cooperation in sizable groups without reciprocity receives considerable attention in game-theoretical modeling. Agents in our study play the Prisoner's Dilemma game cooperating with tolerably similar neighbors. They may imitate cultural markers (tags) and tolerance from more successful neighbors. Alternatively, they break ties to out-group neighbors. New partners are selected either from neighbors' neighbors (clustering) or randomly. Variations in network plasticity (the likelihood of changing partners rather than being influenced) and clustering are explored. With high plasticity and high clustering, networks tend to fragment. With low plasticity and low clustering, networks tend toward global cooperation, but with severe losses of cultural diversity and tolerance. Cooperation in such regimes also proves to be vulnerable to defection. Between, there is a space displaying relatively stable and widespread cooperation with diversity and tolerance. We note some important structural characteristics of the networks evolving in this space. © The Author(s) 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, J. W., & Hanneman, R. A. (2014). Coevolutionary Dynamics of Cultural Markers, Parochial Cooperation, and Networks. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58(2), 226–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002712468691

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free