Journal article

A cognitive neuroscience framework for understanding causal reasoning and the law.

Fugelsang J, Dunbar K ...see all

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, vol. 359, issue 1451 (2004) pp. 1749-1754

  • 67

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 12

    Citations

    Citations of this article.
Sign in to save reference

Abstract

Over the past couple of decades, there have been great developments in the fields of psychology and cognitive neuroscience that have allowed the advancement of our understanding of how people make judgements about causality in several domains. We provide a review of some of the contemporary psychological models of causal thinking that are directly relevant to legal reasoning. In addition, we cover some exciting new research using advanced neuroimaging techniques that have helped to uncover the underlying neural signatures of complex causal reasoning. Through the use of functional imaging, we provide a first-hand look at how the brain responds to evidence that is either consistent or inconsistent with one's beliefs and expectations. Based on the data covered in this review, we propose some ideas for how the effectiveness of causal reasoning, especially as it pertains to legal decision-making, may be facilitated.

Author-supplied keywords

  • causality
  • causation
  • decision-making
  • functional magnetic resonance imaging
  • legal

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

  • Jonathan A. Fugelsang

  • Kevin N Dunbar

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free