Cognitive reality and the phonological lexicon: A review

  • Coleman J
  • 62


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 18


    Citations of this article.


What are phonological entries in the mental lexicon like? On the basis of rational argumentation, many phonologists believe them to be parsimonious articulatory specifications. I will review the neuroscience literature relating to phonological representation in the mental lexicon and the possible role of articulatory representations, and argue: (1) That there are probably not distinct mental lexicons for speech perception and production; (2) that entries in the lexicon are very probably auditory, and improbably articulatory; (3) that articulatory recoding takes place for certain difficult phonological tasks that possibly do not arise in normal speaking, such as phoneme monitoring and same/different judgements; (4) that the arguments from speech perception studies for articulatory representations in the lexicon are, furthermore, empirically weak, because a number of additional arguments from phonetics and phonology suggest that auditory classifications in some cases make more sense than articulatory ones.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • John Coleman

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free