Collaborative Communication in Interfirm Relationships: Moderating Effects of Integration and Control

14Citations
Citations of this article
223Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Governance strategies, such as integration or control, structure and regulate the conduct of parties in exchange relationships; as such, they serve to constrain the latitude of the decision making of channel partners. Similarly, collaborative communication can be used to create an atmosphere of mutual support, thereby creating volitional compliance between partners. The authors develop a model that addresses the interrelationships of governance and communication and examine the effects of collaborative communication on channel outcomes (the dealer's perceptions of commitment to, satisfaction with, and coordination of activities with a focal manufacturer) across various levels of integration and control. Based on survey data collected from a national sample of computer dealers, the findings indicate that when levels of integration or manufacturer control are high, the effect of collaborative communication on outcomes is weaker than when integration or control is low.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mohr, J. J., Fisher, R. J., & Nevin, J. R. (1996). Collaborative Communication in Interfirm Relationships: Moderating Effects of Integration and Control. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000307

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free