Comment on "Two enigmas in proprioception: Abundance and location of muscle spindles" by T. Kokkorogiannis

  • Banks R
  • 33


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 1


    Citations of this article.


I present observations on the numbers and distributions of muscle spindles indicating that spindle number is an important controlled variable of muscle design, but the distribution of spindles within a muscle is not. Although our understanding of the functional correlates of spindle number is far from complete, I argue that nothing that is known about their number or distribution is inconsistent with them acting as length sensors, in contradiction to Kokkorogiannis's comment [Brain Res. Bull., this issue] on Windorst's review [U. Windhorst, Muscle proprioceptive feedback and spinal networks, Brain Res. Bull. 73 (2007) 155-202]. © 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Muscle spindle
  • Proprioception

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • R. W. Banks

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free