A comparative study of Desktop, fishtank, and cave systems for the exploration of volume rendered confocal data sets

  • Prabhat
  • Forsberg A
  • Katzourin M
 et al. 
  • 52


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 39


    Citations of this article.


We present a participant study that compares biological exploration tasks using volume renderings of laser confocal microscopy data across three environments which vary in level of immersion. For the tasks, data, and visualization approach used in our study, we found that subjects qualitatively preferred and quantitatively performed better in environments with greater levels of immersion. Subjects performed real-world biological data analysis tasks that emphasized understanding spatial relationships including characterizing the general features in a volume, identifying co-located features, and reporting geometric relationships such as whether clusters of cells were coplanar. After analyzing data in each environment, subjects were asked to choose which environment they wanted to analyze additional data sets in--subjects uniformly selected the Cave environment.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Participant evaluation
  • Participant studies
  • Scientific visualization
  • Virtual reality
  • Volume rendering

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Prabhat

  • Andrew Forsberg

  • Michael Katzourin

  • Kristi Wharton

  • Mel Slater

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free