Comparative Study of Stability After Total Knee Arthroplasties Between Navigation System and Conventional Techniques

24Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability of mediolateral laxity in extension and anteroposterior laxity in 90° of flexion using stress radiographs, modified Hospital for Special Surgery scores, and range of motion of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed using a navigation system (navigation-assisted group, 42 knees) after a minimum 1-year follow-up and to compare them with those of a conventional TKA (conventional group, 44 knees) using a gap technique. The mean medial laxities were 3.5° in the navigation-assisted group and 4.0° in the conventional group, and the mean lateral and anteroposterior laxities were 4.4° and 4.2° in 7.1 and 7.0 mm, respectively. These results showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Thus, we concluded that there is no significant difference between navigation-based and conventional techniques in terms of TKA stability. In addition, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups in modified HSS scores or range of motion. © 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Song, E. K., Seon, J. K., Yoon, T. R., Park, S. J., Cho, S. G., & Yim, J. H. (2007). Comparative Study of Stability After Total Knee Arthroplasties Between Navigation System and Conventional Techniques. Journal of Arthroplasty, 22(8), 1107–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.11.004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free