Comparison of ABC/2 estimation technique to computer-assisted planimetric analysis in warfarin-related intracerebral parenchymal hemorrhage

212Citations
Citations of this article
121Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Purpose - The ABC/2 formula is a reliable estimation technique of intracerebral hematoma volume. However, oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT)-related intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) compared with primary ICH is based on a different pathophysiological mechanism, and various shapes of hematomas are more likely to occur. Our objective was to validate the ABC/2 technique based on analyses of the hematoma shapes in OAT-related ICH. Methods - We reviewed the computed tomography scans of 83 patients with OAT-associated intraparenchymal ICH. Location was divided into deep, lobar, cerebellar, and brain stem hemorrhage. Shape of the ICH was divided into (A) round-to-ellipsoid, (B) irregular with frayed margins, and (C) multinodular to separated. The ABC/2 technique was compared with computer-assisted planimetric analyses with regard to hematoma site and shape. Results - The mean hematoma volume was 40.83±3.9 cm3 (ABC/2) versus 36.6±3.5 cm3 (planimetric analysis). Bland-Altman plots suggested equivalence of both estimation techniques, especially for smaller ICH volumes. The most frequent location was a deep hemorrhage (54%), followed by lobar (21%), cerebellar (14%) and brain stem hemorrhage (11%). The most common shape was round-to-ellipsoid (44%), followed by irregular ICH (31%) and separated and multinodular shapes (25%). In the latter, ABC/2 formula significantly overestimated volume by +32.1% (round shapes by +6.7%; irregular shapes by +14.9%; P ANOVA <0.01). Variation of the denominator toward ABC/3 in cases of irregularly and separately shaped hematomas revealed more a precise volume estimation with a deviation of -10.3% in irregular and +5.6% in separately shaped hematomas. Conclusions - In patients with OAT-related ICH, >50% of bleedings are irregularly shaped. In these cases, hematoma volume is significantly overestimated by the ABC/2 formula. Modification of the denominator to 3 (ie, ABC/3) measured ICH volume more accurately in these patients potentially facilitating treatment decisions. © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huttner, H. B., Steiner, T., Hartmann, M., Köhrmann, M., Juettler, E., Mueller, S., … Schellinger, P. D. (2006, February). Comparison of ABC/2 estimation technique to computer-assisted planimetric analysis in warfarin-related intracerebral parenchymal hemorrhage. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000198806.67472.5c

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free