A comparison of different input devices for a 3D environment

  • Dang N
  • Tavanti M
  • Rankin I
 et al. 
  • 24

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 10

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

This paper presents a usability study comparing wand, voice, and two tablet-PC based interfaces across a task requiring three-dimensional surface exploration, information gathering and recall of information. The aim of this study was to identify a suitable interaction interface, among the ones implemented in a three-dimensional environment for Air Traffic Control, for interactive exploration of and gathering information about three-dimensional weather structures. Data concerning time, error rate, number of control actions as well as participants' feedback on ease of learning, ease of use, frustration and perceived difficulty of the performed task were collected. The results indicate that the wand interface supported better performance when compared with the other interaction interfaces. Among the four interaction interfaces, the voice interface seems to present several limitations, mostly related to time lag in the voice recognition, which was judged by the subjects as a source of frustration. © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Author-supplied keywords

  • 3D environments
  • 3D interaction
  • 6DOF devices
  • Tablet-PC based Interfaces
  • Usability evaluation
  • Voice command

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Nguyen Thong Dang

  • Monica Tavanti

  • Ivan Rankin

  • Matthew Cooper

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free