Comparison of four methods for estimating complete life tables from abridged life tables using mortality data supplied to eurocare-3

  • Baili P
  • Micheli A
  • Montanari A
 et al. 
  • 20


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 18


    Citations of this article.


ABSTRACT To estimate mortality due to cancer, it is necessary to have mortality data by year of age in the population of cancer patients. When such data are not available, estimating one-year (complete) life tables from five-year (abridged) life tables is necessary. Four such methods—Elandt–Johnson, Kostaki, Brass logit, and Akima spline methods—are compared with respect to 782 empirical complete life tables pertaining to 19 European regions or countries, from 1954 to 2000. Abridged life tables are first derived from the empirical ones, then used to produce one-year-life tables by each of the four methods. These reconstituted complete life tables are then compared with the empirical complete life tables. Among the four methods, the Elandt–Johnson demographic method produces the best reconstitutions at adult ages, specifically those ages at which observed cancer survival needs to be corrected.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Abridged life tables
  • Complete life tables
  • General mortality

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • P. Baili

  • A. Micheli

  • A. Montanari

  • R. Capocaccia

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free