A comparison of methodologies for designing for human variability

  • Garneaua C
  • Parkinsona M
  • 23

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 14

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

In the design of artefacts that interact with people, the spatial dimensions of the user population are often used to size and engineer the artefact. The variability in anthropometry indicates the fixed allocation of space, adjustability requirements, or how many sizes are needed to accommodate the intended user population. Various tools are used to achieve this goal, including boundary manikins, digital human models, prototypes and population models, and hybrid methods that combine the approaches. The present work explores each of these and their relative strengths and weaknesses. This is done in the context of a univariate case study involving the adjustability requirements of a stationary bicycle. An experiment involving 51 individuals was conducted to obtain the data necessary for utilising and evaluating the methods.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Anthropometry
  • Boundary manikins
  • Design methods
  • Population models
  • Spatial analyses

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Christopher J. Garneaua

  • Matthew B. Parkinsona

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free