Comparison of outcomes and costs between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open resection at a single center

  • A.M. F
  • K. P
  • F. B
 et al. 
  • 1

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Background The cost implications of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) and a detailed breakdown of hospital expenditures has not been presented in the literature to date. This study aimed to compare hospital costs and shortterm clinical outcomes between LDP and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). Methods The authors evaluated all the distal pancreatic resections performed at their center between January 2004 and March 2010. Parametric and nonparametric statistical analysis was used to compare hospital departmental and total hospital costs as well as oncologic and surgical outcomes. Results A total of 118 cases (42 laparoscopic resections, including 5 conversions, and 76 open resections) were analyzed. The demographic characteristics were similar between the groups except for a predominance of females in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.036). The indications for surgery differed by a paucity of malignant tumors being approached laparoscopically (P < 0.001). Intraoperatively, there were no differences in estimated blood loss, operating room time, or transfusion requirement. The pathologic outcomes did not differ significantly. The median hospital length of stay (LOS) was 5 days (range 3-31 days) for the LDP cohort and 7 days (range 4-19 days) for the ODP cohort (P < 0.001). Postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred for 22 patients, with a higher proportion observed in the LDP group (28.57%; n = 12) than in the open group (13.16%; n = 10; P = 0.05). However, the rates for grade B and higher grade fistula were higher in the ODP group (0 LDP and 4 ODP). The median preadmission and operative costs did not differ significantly. The ODP cohort had significantly higher costs in all other hospital departments, including the total cost. Conclusion LDP is both a cost-effective and safe approach for distal pancreatic lesions. This series showed a shorter LOS and lower total hospital costs for LDP than for ODP, accompanied by equivalent postoperative outcomes. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011.

Author-supplied keywords

  • adult
  • article
  • cohort analysis
  • comparative study
  • controlled study
  • cost benefit analysis
  • cost effectiveness analysis
  • demography
  • female
  • hospital cost
  • hospital department
  • hospitalization
  • human
  • intermethod comparison
  • laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
  • length of stay
  • major clinical study
  • male
  • malignant neoplasm
  • nonparametric test
  • oncological parameters
  • open distal pancreatectomy
  • outcome assessment
  • pancreas fistula
  • pancreatectomy
  • parametric test
  • peroperative care
  • postoperative complication
  • priority journal
  • risk assessment
  • sex ratio
  • surgical approach
  • treatment indication

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Fox A.M.

  • Pitzul K.

  • Bhojani F.

  • Kaplan M.

  • Moulton C.-A.

  • Wei A.C.

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free