A comparison of rural and urban ambulance crashes

  • Weiss S
  • Ellis R
  • Ernst A
 et al. 
  • 39

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 35

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Ambulance crashes are a significant safety issue both to the EMTs and to patients transported in the vehicle. Safety issues are dependent on the environment and may be different in rural and urban settings. Ambulance crashes reported to the State EMS bureau during the years of 1993 to 1997 were evaluated. Counties with >250,000 population were considered urban. State population was 2 million urban and 2.8 million rural. Two investigators determined first if the crash was urban or rural. Outcome information was extracted on the degree of injury, citations given, and information on the ambulance and other vehicle condition. In addition, independent variables of weekend versus weekday, day versus night, posted speed, weather, road condition (wet versus dry), intersections, and use of seat belts were extracted. Results were compared using a 2-tailed Chi-square or Fisher's exact with significance at P < .05. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each variable. There were a total of 183 Ambulance crashes, 115 urban (19/million pop/yr), and 68 rural (8/million pop/yr). Significantly lower percentage of injury crashes occurred in the urban setting (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.98) with fewer of these considered "severe" (OR = 0.0, 95% CI = 0.0 to 0.73). Citations were more likely to be issued to the urban ambulance driver (OR = 4.95, 95% Cl = 1.09 to 45.70) and the other urban vehicle driver (OR = 3.65, 95% CI = 1.37 to 11.31). However, the urban ambulance was less likely to be damaged (OR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.55), disabled (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.20 to 0.84), or towed (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.20 to 0.83). In the urban setting fewer vehicles were traveling in areas with posted speeds >54 mph (OR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.06 to 0.78) and nonrestrained people were less likely to be injured (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.06 to 1.25). For injured persons there was no difference in independent variables in the urban versus rural settings. Although the rate of ambulance injuries was greater in the urban environment, the severity of the injuries was worse in the rural environments where crashes occurred at higher posted speeds. In the rural setting nonrestrained passengers were more likely to be injured. Copyright © 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Ambulance
  • EMS
  • Injury prevention
  • Motor vehicle crashes
  • Prehospital

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free