Comparison of two pressure-sensitive periodontal probes and a manual periodontal probe in shallow and deep pockets

  • Rams T
  • Slots J
  • 14

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 2

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Three periodontal probes--a manual probe and two computerized, pressure-sensitive probes--were studied to determine their relative recording accuracy. In the first part of the study, replicate probing measurements were taken with the three probes at shallow (less than 5 mm) and deeper (greater than or equal to 5 mm) periodontal sites. In the second part of the study, probing depths were determined on all teeth except third molars by the three probing techniques at a single appointment. Mean values between replicate probings for each instrument did not differ statistically, except for duplicate measurements with one of the electronic probes in pockets with depths greater than 5 mm. All three probes demonstrated higher standard deviations with increasing depth, which indicates decreased reproducibility of probing depth measurements. Results of this study suggest that an electronic, pressure-sensitive probe yields more reproducible probing depth measurements than a conventional manual periodontal probe.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Periodontal Attachment Loss/diagnosis
  • Periodontal Pocket/ diagnosis/pathology
  • Periodontics/ instrumentation
  • Pressure
  • Reproducibility of Results

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • T E Rams

  • J Slots

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free