Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging techniques for measurement of aortic annulus diameters before transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

  • Altiok E
  • Koos R
  • Schröder J
 et al. 
  • 26

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Different two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques are used for procedure planning and selection of prosthesis size before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. This study sought to compare different 2D and 3D imaging techniques and determine the accuracy of 3D transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for accurate analysis of aortic annulus dimensions.

Author-supplied keywords

  • 80 and over
  • Aged
  • Aortic Valve
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis: diagnosis
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis: therapy
  • Aortic Valve: radiography
  • Aortic Valve: ultrasonography
  • Computer-Assist
  • Computer-Assisted
  • Coronary Angiography
  • Echocardiography
  • Female
  • Germany
  • Heart Catheterization
  • Heart Catheterization: instrumentation
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation: instrumentati
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation: methods
  • Humans
  • Image Interpretation
  • Linear Models
  • Male
  • Observer Variation
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Radiographic Image Interpretation
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Three-Dimensional
  • Tomography
  • Transesophageal
  • X-Ray Computed

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Authors

  • Ertunc Altiok

  • Ralf Koos

  • Jörg Schröder

  • Kathrin Brehmer

  • Sandra Hamada

  • Michael Becker

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free