Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging techniques for measurement of aortic annulus diameters before transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

  • Altiok E
  • Koos R
  • Schroder J
 et al. 
  • 4

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

AIMS: Different two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques are used for procedure planning and selection of prosthesis size before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. This study sought to compare different 2D and 3D imaging techniques and determine the accuracy of 3D transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for accurate analysis of aortic annulus dimensions. METHODS: In 49 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation angiography, 2D transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), 2D and 3D TEE, and dual-source CT (DSCT) were performed to determine aortic annulus diameters. TTE and 2D TEE provided only one diameter of the aortic annulus. Angiography, DSCT and 3D TEE allowed measurement of diameters in sagittal and coronal views. The distance between aortic annulus and left main coronary artery ostium was measured by angiography, DSCT and 3D TEE. RESULTS: Sagittal diameters determined by angiography, TTE, 2D TEE, 3D TEE and DSCT were smaller than coronal diameters determined by angiography, 3D TEE and DSCT. Coronal and sagittal diameters determined by 3D TEE were in high agreement with corresponding measurements by DSCT (23.60+/-1.89 vs 23.46+/-2.07 mm and 22.19+/-1.96 vs 22.27+/-2.01 mm, respectively; mean+/-SD). There was a high correlation between DSCT and 3D TEE for the definition of coronal and sagittal aortic annulus diameters (r=0.88, SEE=0.89 mm and r=0.77, SEE=1.26 mm, respectively). Correlation of 3D TEE (13.47+/-1.67 mm) and DSCT (13.64+/-1.82 mm) in the analysis of the distance between aortic annulus and left main coronary artery ostium was better (r=0.54, SEE=1.55 mm) than between angiography (14.85+/-3.84 mm) and DSCT (r=0.35, SEE=1.77 mm). CONCLUSIONS: 3D imaging techniques should be used to evaluate aortic annulus diameters, as 2D imaging techniques, providing only a sagittal view, underestimate them. 3D TEE provides measurements of aortic annulus diameters similar to those obtained by DSCT.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aortic Valve
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis
  • Cardiac Catheterization
  • Coronary Angiography
  • Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional
  • Echocardiography, Transesophageal
  • Female
  • Germany
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
  • Humans
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Linear Models
  • Male
  • Observer Variation
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assist
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • diagnosis
  • instrumentation
  • methods
  • radiography
  • therapy
  • ultrasonography

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Ertunc Altiok

  • Ralf Koos

  • Jorg Schroder

  • Kathrin Brehmer

  • Sandra Hamada

  • Michael Becker

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free