Comparisons of computed mobile phone induced SAR in the SAM phantom to that in anatomically correct models of the human head

  • Beard B
  • Kainz W
  • Onishi T
 et al. 
  • 49


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 116


    Citations of this article.


The specific absorption rates (SAR) determined computationally in the specific anthropomorphic mannequin (SAM) and anatomically correct models of the human head when exposed to a mobile phone model are compared as part of a study organized by IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee 34, Sub-Committee 2, and Working Group 2, and carried out by an international task force comprising 14 government, academic, and industrial research institutions. The detailed study protocol defined the computational head and mobile phone models. The participants used different finite-difference time-domain software and independently positioned the mobile phone and head models in accordance with the protocol. The results show that when the pinna SAR is calculated separately from the head SAR, SAM produced a higher SAR in the head than the anatomically correct head models. Also the larger (adult) head produced a statistically significant higher peak SAR for both the 1- and 10-g averages than did the smaller (child) head for all conditions of frequency and position.

Author-supplied keywords

  • FDTD methods
  • IEEE standards
  • Phantom
  • Simulation
  • Software standards
  • Specific absorption rate (SAR)
  • Specific anthropomorphic mannequin (SAM)

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Brian B. Beard

  • Wolfgang Kainz

  • Teruo Onishi

  • Takahiro Iyama

  • Soichi Watanabe

  • Osamu Fujiwara

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free