Competitive effects of nondisplaceable organic compounds on trichloroethylene uptake by activated carbon. II. Model verification and applicability to natural organic matter

41Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

An experimental program was carded out to verify theoretical predictions of competitive effects exerted by nondisplaceable organic compounds on the uptake of TCE by activated carbon. Experimental findings were consistent with isotherm sensitivity analysis and thermodynamically based competitive adsorption model predictions. At low loadings of both trichlorobenzene and a natural humic acid, the most significant effect of preloading was to reduce the number of high-energy sites available to TCE. The loss of these sites caused a significant reduction in the site-energy heterogeneity and reduced the extent of adsorption in the low-concentration region. At higher levels of preloading, further changes in the site-energy heterogeneity were small, and uptake was reduced by a roughly equal percentage across a wide range of equilibrium concentrations, suggesting the possibility of a pore blockage (in the case of humic acid) or pore filling (in the case of TCB) mechanism. Measurements of adsorbent surface area and pore volume confirmed that observed reductions in TCE uptake by preloaded carbon were associated with changes in the physical characteristics of the adsorbent. However, reductions in adsorbent surface area could only account for a significant fraction of the observed reduction in TCE uptake when either the amount preloaded was high or the TCE concentration was high, increasing the ability of TCE to compete for adsorption sites.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kilduff, J. E., Karanfil, T., & Weber, W. J. (1998). Competitive effects of nondisplaceable organic compounds on trichloroethylene uptake by activated carbon. II. Model verification and applicability to natural organic matter. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 205(2), 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1998.5603

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free