Complications in tunneled CVL versus PICC lines in very low birth weight infants

31Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: Comparison of complications associated with tunneled central venous lines (TCVLs) versus peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in infants < 1500 g. Study design: A retrospective cohort study at a university medical center. A total of 96 catheters were placed in 60 infants between 4/94 and 3/99. A retrospective review of these infants' medical record was done to review associated complications of catheter placement. Results: Both groups had similar weights and gestational ages. The duration of catheterization was 28 days in TCVLs and 11 days in PICCs (p<0.05). Total, infectious, and mechanical complications between the two groups were similar. Survival function estimates showed no difference between the two groups up to the 15th day of catheterization. Conclusion: There is no difference in efficacy or associated complications between the two groups. If one could anticipate needing a catheter longer than 15 days, then a TCVL might be the better choice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Foo, R., Fujii, A., Harris, J. A., LaMorte, W., & Moulton, S. (2001). Complications in tunneled CVL versus PICC lines in very low birth weight infants. Journal of Perinatology, 21(8), 525–530. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210562

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free