Comprehending Figurative Referential Descriptions

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A common way of referring to people is with figurative language. People can be referred to metaphorically, as in calling a terrible boxer "a creampuff," or metonymically, as in calling a naval admiral "the brass." The present studies investigated the anaphoric inferences that occur during comprehension of figurative referential descriptions. Subjects read short narratives, each ending in either a literal or figurative description of another person. Immediately after the last line of each text, the anaphoric antecedent for the description was presented in a probe recognition task. The results of three experiments indicated that metaphoric and metonymic referential descriptions reinstate their antecedents in the course of comprehension. Subjects were faster at reinstating the antecedents for literal referential descriptions than at reinstating metaphoric and metonymic descriptions. Moreover, people understand metaphoric referential descriptions more easily than they do metonymic ones. The implications of these findings for theories of anaphora resolution and figurative language comprehension are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gibbs, R. W. (1990). Comprehending Figurative Referential Descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.56

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free