Consuming spaces or living places: the competition policy and centres policy dilemma for Main Street planning

  • Wood S
  • Baker R
  • 11

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

This paper engages with the issue of growing tensions in Australian retail planning between centres policy and competition policy. Centres policies, including restrictions on supermarket locations, have long been viewed by many retail planners as key to the maintenance of Main Street viability and vitality. More recently, advocates of competition policy have suggested existing centres policies are anti-competitive, and have argued for a more ‘ fl exible ’ approach to centres development. Against this backdrop, the broad aim of the paper is to explore how more relaxed controls on supermarket locations might affect Main Street viability and vitality. Two town centres are examined, each associated with different degrees of regulation and characterised by different levels of competition. The effects of these differences on the viability and vitality of the respective centres are explored through analysis of the movement patterns of 148 tracked pedestrians, along with various land use and built form factors.

Author-supplied keywords

  • 1072954 registered
  • 12
  • 24 may 2014
  • 48
  • at
  • budapest university of technology
  • by
  • england and wales registered
  • informa ltd registered in
  • number
  • on
  • publisher
  • routledge
  • s article was downloaded

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Stephen Wood

  • Robert G.V. Baker

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free