We shall argue that the kind of contextualism we defend, viz., the integrative contextualism, offers a way to coordinate and integrate some of the various competing concepts of justification. We shall show how, since each of these concepts involves different intuitions and standards of justification of beliefs, it is possible to distinguish different contexts of justification attribution, each of them, equally valid. In particular, the integrative contextualism, we defend, shows that disputes between two theories of justification, namely the externalist and internalist theories of justification, are established on the erroneous assumption that there is only one valid concept of justification.
CITATION STYLE
Vázquez Gutiérrez, R., & Campos, J. G. (2013). Contextualismo integrativo: Una manera de ordenar los distintos conceptos de justificación epistémica. Theoria (Spain), 28(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.2579
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.