Continuing debates on direct social perception: Some notes on Gallagher's analysis of "the new hybrids"

5Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This commentary argues that Gallagher's account of direct social perception has remained underdeveloped in several respects. Gallagher has not provided convincing evidence to support his claim that mindreading is rare in social situations. He and other direct perception theorists have not offered a substantive critique of standard theories of mindreading because they have attacked a much stronger claim about the putative unobservability of mental states than most theories of mindreading imply. To provide a genuine alternative to standard theories of mindreading, the direct perception theorist needs to provide more detailed answers to the following questions: What are the criteria for distinguishing perceptual processes from non-perceptual processes? How exactly does direct social perception function on the subpersonal level? What is the content of direct social perception? How does direct perception theory relate to more recent developments in the mindreading literature?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bohl, V. (2015). Continuing debates on direct social perception: Some notes on Gallagher’s analysis of “the new hybrids.” Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 466–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free