The controversies over the customary prohibition on the use of force: A methodological debate

  • Corten O
  • 41


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 22


    Citations of this article.


Controversies about the rule prohibiting the use of force have mainly focused on issues such as the conditions for self-defence or the existence of a right to humanitarian intervention. Beyond the question of the validity or relevance of each substantial argument, a comprehensive analysis of the doctrine reveals that the debate is actually more about methodology than substance. Hence, those who stand for an enlarged conception of the right to self-defence or who support a right of humanitarian intervention tend to adopt a particularly loose method in defining the content of the customary rule.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Olivier Corten

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free