Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value?

  • Dowell G
  • Hart S
  • Yeung B
  • 304


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 494


    Citations of this article.


Examines whether having a stringent global environmental standard contributes more to a multinational enterprise's (MNE's) firm value compared to using lower or host country standards - often lax to attract inward investment. Argues both sides. Cites studies showing that a proactive environmental policy links with superior stock performance. Explicates selection of 89 manufacturing/mining MNEs for examination, and proxies used for firm value and other cost factors. Groups the firms into those using local, US, or a global environmental standard during 1994-1997. Shows that local policy firms pollute more via the Toxic Inventory Release database. Employs Tobins 'q' that accommodates capital structure and intangibles such as marketing and R&D. Concludes from bivariate and multiple regression analyses that firms not adopting local standards have higher market values, and those employing a global standard have the highest 'q' and highest market value. Posits reasons to explain outcomes.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Glen Dowell

  • Stuart Hart

  • Bernard Yeung

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free