Corporate governance, auditing, and reporting distortions

7Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Conventional wisdom suggests that independent boards limit earnings distortions and promote accurate reporting. In contrast, this study indicates that having insiders on boards enhances reporting integrity. The central result is that strengthening board independence curtails earnings overstatements but heightens the likelihood of understatements. This asymmetry occurs because reinforcing board independence on one hand limits the CEO's ability to overreport but on the other hand encourages the auditor to rely on the board's monitoring and consequently economize on effort. The reduced effort impairs the auditor's ability to verify high earnings and, because auditors favor conservative reports when in doubt, leads to increased incidence of conservative understatements.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ramanan, R. N. V. (2014). Corporate governance, auditing, and reporting distortions. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 29(3), 306–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X14535779

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free