How Costly Is Diversity? Affirmative Action in Light of Gender Differences in Competitiveness

  • Niederle M
  • Segal C
  • Vesterlund L
  • 217

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 71

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Affirmative action is often criticized for causing reverse discrimination and lowering the qualifications of those hired under the policy. However, the magnitude of such adverse effects depends on whether the best suited candidate is hired absent the policy. Indeed affirmative action may compensate for the distortion discrimination imposes on the selection of candidates. This paper asks whether affirmative action can have a similar corrective impact when qualified individuals fail to apply for a job. We evaluate the effect of introducing a gender quota in an environment where high-performing women fail to enter competitions they can win. We show that guaranteeing women equal representation among winners increases their entry. The response exceeds that predicted by the change in probability of winning and is in part driven by women being more willing to compete against other women. The consequences are substantial as the boost in supply essentially eliminates the anticipated costs of the policy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Muriel Niederle

  • Carmit Segal

  • Lise Vesterlund

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free