Criminal deterrence when there are offsetting risks: Traffic cameras, vehicular accidents, and public safety

7Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Numerous cities have enacted electronic monitoring programs at traffic intersections in an effort to reduce the high number of vehicle accidents. The rationale is that the higher expected fines for running a red light will induce drivers to stop and lead to fewer cross-road collisions. However, the cameras also incentivize drivers to accept a greater accident risk from stopping. We evaluate the termination of a monitoring program via a voter referendum using 12 years of geocoded police accident data. We find that the cameras changed the composition of accidents but no evidence of a reduction in total accidents or injuries.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gallagher, J., & Fisher, P. J. (2020). Criminal deterrence when there are offsetting risks: Traffic cameras, vehicular accidents, and public safety. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 12(3), 202–237. https://doi.org/10.1257/POL.20170674

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free