A critique of current methods in nematode taxonomy

  • Abebe E
  • Mekete T
  • Thomas W
  • 71


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 17


    Citations of this article.


Morphology based nematode taxonomy and biodiversity studies have historically challenged most biologists. In the past few decades, there have been efforts to integrate molecular methods and digital 3D image-capturing technology in nematode taxonomy, the former to enhance the accuracy of identification of such a taxonomically challenging group and the latter to communicate morphological data. While the employment of these two methods is growing in recent taxonomic, biodiversity and biogeographic studies, a movement to abandon traditional phenotypic identification methods altogether has emerged. Proponents try to justify this trend by citing the challenging gap between the high estimated number of undescribed species and the limited ability of traditional taxonomy to accomplish the task of documenting such diversity. Here we present a review of the various techniques used in the taxonomy of free-living and plant parasitic nematodes and critique those methods in the context of recent developments and trends including their implications in nematode taxonomy, biodiversity and biogeography. Key words : Species delimitation, taxonomic methods, genetic and molecular methods, traditional taxonomy, nematode biodiversity.

Author-supplied keywords

  • genetic and molecular methods
  • nematode biodiversity
  • species delimitation
  • taxonomic methods
  • traditional taxonomy

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Eyualem Abebe

  • Tesfamariam Mekete

  • William K. Thomas

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free