Defending the indefensible: A critique and analysis of psycholegal defense arguments of hate crime perpetrators

  • Dunbar E
  • 6

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 7

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Hate crimes are a recently defined special class of violence or threat of violence to a person,property, and/or community. These crimes include a prominent symbolic component that affectsa class of victimized parties, and provides an understanding of the motives of the perpetrator.Given the critical importance of intent in committing a hate crime, it is not surprising that defenseattorneys have sought out counterarguments based on psychological theory to limit the perpetrator'sculpability and achieve leniency. These defense strategies are considered in terms of theirveracity vis-à-vis available behavioral research. The implications of these defense strategies are considered in terms of how psychological research may be employed in prosecution and presentencing decision making concerning perpetrator placement.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Edward Dunbar

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free