Delusional misidentification syndrome: Why such nosologic challenge remains intractable

6Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The delusional misidentification syndrome has lately been the object of lengthy psychopathological discussions. Controversies persist as to how best to define it, distinguish its subtypes and set their limits. Attempts to provide this syndrome with a better conceptual framework have usually relied on proposing new definitions and classifications. In this article, we suggest that some prevailing difficulties are basically related to two separate but intertwined issues: the self-reflexive property of the human mental functioning and the first-person linguistic expression of human experience. We argue that this discussion belongs to a broader context than the one it is usually referred to, as it deals with problems germane to conceptual psychopathological investigations in general. In that regard, DMS provides us with a very telling example, to the extent to which it has, at its core, to account for the puzzling phenomena of identity, which are particularly affected by cultural and linguistic variables. Copyright © 2006 S. Karger AG.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodrigues, A. C. T., & Banzato, C. E. M. (2006). Delusional misidentification syndrome: Why such nosologic challenge remains intractable. Psychopathology, 39(6), 296–302. https://doi.org/10.1159/000095777

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free