Dendritic Na+ Channels Amplify EPSPs in Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Cells

  • Lipowsky R
  • Gillessen T
  • Alzheimer C
  • 42

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 1. Whole cell recordings were performed on the somata of CA1 pyramidal neurons in the rat hippocampal slice preparation. Remote synaptic events were evoked by electrical stimulation of Schaffer collateral/commissural fibers in outer stratum radiatum. To isolate non-N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) -mediated excitatory postsyn-aptic potentials (EPSPs), bath solutions contained the NMDA re-ceptor antagonist, u-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (D-APV; 30 PM), the y-aminobutyric acid-A (GABA*) receptor antagonist, bicuculline (10 PM), and the GABAB receptor antagonists, CGP 35348 (30 PM) or, in some experiments, saclofen (100 PM). 2. Local application of tetrodotoxin (TTX; 0.5-10 PM) into the proximal region of the apical dendrite reduced the peak ampli-tude of somatically recorded EPSPs by 28% on average. In contrast to dendritic TTX application, injection of TTX into the axosomatic region of the recorded neuron reduced EPSP amplitude by only 12% on average. 3. Spill-over of dendritically applied TTX into stratum pyrami-dale or into outer stratum radiatum was ruled out experimentally: somatic action potentials and field EPSPs recorded near the stimu-lation site in outer stratum radiatum remained unaffected by local TTX application. 4. Variations of somatic membrane potential revealed a strong voltage dependence of EPSP reduction after dendritic TTX applica-tion with the effect increasing substantially with membrane depo-larization. Together with the field recordings from stratum radia-turn, this finding argues strongly against a predominantly presynap-tic site of TTX action. 5. We therefore ascribe the EPSP decrease after local TTX ap-plication to the proximal dendrite to suppression of dendritic Na' channels, which we assume to give rise to a noninactivating (persis-tent) Na+ current (INap) in the subthreshold voltage range. Our data suggest that presumed dendritic INaP produces considerable elevation of remote excitatory signals, thereby compensating for much of their electrotonic attenuation. 6. The experimental findings were related to computer simula-tions performed on a reduced compartmental model of the CA1 neuron. Because the experimental evidence available so far yields only indirect clues on the strength and distribution of INaP, we allowed considerable variations in these parameters. We also varied both size and location of synaptic input. 7. The major conclusions drawn from these simulations are the following : somatic INaP alone produces little EPSP enhancement; INaP density at the axon hillock/initial segment has to be at least twice the density at the soma to produce substantial EPSP amplifi-cation; depending on the density and distribution of dendritic INaP, ~80% of a remote synaptic potential arrives at the soma (compared with only 52% in a passive dendrite); synaptic potentials receive progressively more elevation by dendritic INaP the stronger they are; even if restricted to the proximal segment of the apical dendrite, INaP also affects dendritic processing at more distal segments; and spa-tial distribution rather than local density appears to be the most important parameter determining the role of dendritic INap in synap-tic integration.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Rupert Lipowsky

  • Thomas Gillessen

  • Christian Alzheimer

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free