Developing consensus: Mercury science and policy in the NAFTA countries (Canada, the United States and Mexico)

16Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The international science community has recognized methylmercury in the aquatic food chain, as a potential environmental and human health risk. As a result, countries around the world have implemented a number of mercury management initiatives. The United States, Mexico and Canada in consultation with stakeholders are developing a trilateral North American Regional Action Plan (NARAP) on mercury. Through public involvement in the decision making process, the NARAP has offered opportunities for more transparency in transactions between governments, industry and stakeholders. In spite of the available scientific information, there are still important uncertainties associated with the mercury issue. These knowledge gaps include: the most appropriate methylmercury reference dose for sensitive groups; the percentage of the North American population that is at risk from methylmercury exposure; spatial and temporal mercury deposition patterns in each country; the link between mercury emissions, atmospheric deposition and methylmercury concentrations in fish; and the relative magnitude of contributions from natural and anthropogenic sources. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pilgrim, W., Schroeder, W., Porcella, D. B., Santos-Burgoa, C., Montgomery, S., Hamilton, A., & Trip, L. (2000). Developing consensus: Mercury science and policy in the NAFTA countries (Canada, the United States and Mexico). Science of the Total Environment, 261(1–3), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00635-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free