Development and validation of the Living with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Questionnaire.

  • McKenna S
  • Meads D
  • Doward L
 et al. 
  • 2

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Purpose: Available patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) focus primarily on impairment (symptoms) and activities (functioning). The purpose of the study was to develop a patient-based PRO measure for COPD that captures the overall everyday impact of living with COPD from the patient’s perspective. Methods: LCOPD items (Living with COPD Questionnaire) were generated from qualitative interviews in the UK and focus groups in the USA. The draft measure was tested for face and content validity in both countries. Item reduction and testing for reproducibility and construct validity was conducted via Rasch and traditional psychometric analyses. Results: The draft LCOPD was found to be relevant and acceptable to patients in the UK (N = 19) and US (N = 16). Application of Rasch analysis to data collected in validation studies (n = 162 in the UK and 145 in US) identified a 22-item scale that measured a single construct in both countries. Psychometric analyses indicated that this version was internally consistent and reproducible. Scores on the measure were related as expected to clinician ratings of disease severity and patient ratings of COPD severity and general health. Conclusions: The LCOPD is a new measure examining the everyday impact of living with COPD. It demonstrates good scaling properties and may prove valuable in understanding treatment benefits. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved). (journal abstract)

Author-supplied keywords

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Questionnair
  • Health
  • Psychometrics
  • Questionnaires
  • Test Construction
  • Test Validity
  • general health test development
  • psychometrics
  • test validity

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Stephen P McKenna

  • David M Meads

  • Lynda C Doward

  • James Twiss

  • Robin Pokrzywinski

  • Dennis Revicki

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free