: This review evaluates the evidence for the diagnostic efficacy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for impacted teeth and associated features. PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched using specific indexing terms and reference lists were hand searched. Two reviewers selected relevant publications on the basis of pre-determined inclusion criteria. Original studies were assessed using a modification of the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) tool. The literature search yielded 96 titles, of which 7 were included in the review. There was only limited evidence for diagnostic efficacy expressed as sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Only two studies compared CBCT and panoramic radiographs with a valid reference method and presented the results in terms of percentage of correct diagnoses. This review reveals a need for studies that meet methodological standards for diagnostic efficacy of CBCT in the diagnosis of impacted teeth. Copyright (C) 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; References: 1. Andreasen JO, Pindborg JJ, Hjorting-Hansen E, Axell T. Oral health care: more than caries and periodontal disease. A survey of epidemiological studies on oral disease. Int Dent J. (1986); 36:207-214. 2. Rajasuo A, Murtomaa H, Meeuman JH. Comparison of the clinical status of third molars in young men in 1949 and 1990. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. (1993); 76:694-698. 3. Leung YY, Cheung LK. Safety of coronectomy versus excision of wisdom teeth: A randomized controlled trial. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. (2009); 108:821-827. 4. Sedaghatfar M, August MA, Dodson TB. Panoramic radiographic findings as predictors of inferior alveolar nerve exposure following third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. (2005); 63:3-7. 5. Howe EL, Poyton HE. Prevention of damage to the inferior dental nerve during the extraction of mandibular third molars. Br Dent J. (1960); 109:355-363. 6. Rood JP, Shehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. (1990); 28:20-25. 7. Hillerup S. Iatrogenic injury to oral branches of the trigeminal nerve: records of 449 cases. Clin Oral Investig. (2007); 11:133-142. 8. Bishara SE. Clinical management of impacted maxillary canines. Semin Orthod. (1998); 4:87-98. 9. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. The palatally displaced canine as a dental anomaly of genetic origin. Angle Orthod. (1994); 64:249-256. 10. Leifert S, Jonas IE. Dental anomalies as micro symptom of palatal canine displacement. J Orofac Orthop. (2003); 64:108-120. 11. Taylor RW. Eruptive abnormalities in orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod. (1998); 4:79-86. 12. Chaushu S, Chaushu G, Becher A. The use of panoramic radiographs to localize displaced maxillary canines. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. (1999); 85:511-516. 13. Liu DG, Zhang WL, Zhang ZY, Wu YT, Ma XC. Localization of impacted maxillary canines and observation of adjacent incisor resorption with cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. (2008); 105:91-98. 14. Yusof WZ. Non-syndromal multiple supernumerary teeth: literature review. J Can Dent Assoc. (1990); 56:147-149. 15. Bodin I, Julin P, Thomsson M. Hyperdontia:I. Frequency and distribution of supernumerary teeth among 21,609 patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. (1978); 7:15-17. 16. Gallas MM, Garcia A. Retention of permanent incisors by mesiodens: a family affair. Br Dent J. (2000); 188:63-64. 17. Atasu M, Orguneser A. Inverted impaction of a mesiodens: a case report. J Clin Pediatr Dent. (1999); 23:143-145. 18. Jacobs R, Willems G. Inverted eruption of a supplemental lower premolar: report of an unusual case. Int J Paediatr Dent. (2003); 13:46-50. 19. Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Lambrechts P, Loozen G, Willems G. Root resorption of the maxillary lateral incisor caused by impacted canine: a literature review. Clin Oral Investig. (2009); 13:247-255. 20. Flygare L, Ohman A. Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal. Clin Oral Investig. (2008); 12:291-302. 21. SedentexCT project. Radiation Protection: Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Provisional guidelines (v1.1 May 2009). Available at:, accessed 16 December 2009. 22. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making. (1991); 11:88-94. 23. CBEM-Centre for evidence-based medicine. Diagnostic critical appraisal sheet. Available at:, accessed 9 December 2009. 24. Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett DL; Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA. (1994); 271:389-391. 25. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL; Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients?. JAMA. (1994); 271:703-707. 26. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. (2003); 3:25-37. 27. Pawelzik J, Cohnen M, Willers R, Becker J. A comparison of conventional panoramic radiographs with volumetric computed tomography images in the preoperative assessment of impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. (2002); 60:979-984. 28. Neugebauer J, Shirani R, Mischkowski RA, Ritter L, Scheer M, Keeve E et al. Comparison of cone-beam volumetric imaging and combined plain radiographs for localization of the mandibular canal before removal of impacted lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. (2008); 105:633-642. 29. Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, Yamashiro M, Maruoka Y, Ohbayashi N et al. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. (2007); 103:253-259. 30. Tantanapornkul W, Okochi K, Bhakdinaronk A, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T. Correlation of darkening of impacted mandibular third molar root on digital panoramic images with cone beam computed tomography findings. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. (2009); 38:11-16. 31. Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Borstlap WA, Mulder J, Berge SJ. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. (2009); 38:964-971. 32. Sakabe J, Kuroki Y, Fujimaki S, Nakajima I, Honda K. Reproducibility and accuracy of measuring unerupted teeth using limited cone beam X-ray CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. (2007); 36:2-6. 33. Nakagawa Y, Ishii H, Nomura Y, Watanabe NY, Hoshiba D, Kobayashi K et al. Third molar position: Reliability of panoramic radiograph. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. (2007); 65:1303-1308. 34. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis PP, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Radiology. (2003); 226:24-28. 35. Whiting P, Harbord R, Kleijnen J. No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. (2005); 5:19.
Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research
Choose a citation style from the tabs below