Diel variation in use of cover and feeding activity of a benthic freshwater fish in response to olfactory cues of a diurnal predator

  • Vanderpham J
  • Nakagawa S
  • Closs G
  • 17


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 6


    Citations of this article.


Some fish recognize the threat of predatory fish through chemical cues, which may result in variation in diel activity. However, there is little experimental evidence of diel shifts in activity of prey fish in response to the diel activity of a predator. We compared the total prey consumed and the use of cover by common bullies ( Gobiomorphus cotidianus ), a native benthic feeding eleotrid, when exposed to the odour of an exotic predator, European perch ( Perca fluviatilis ), over a 12-h period. Our results showed no significant effect of perch odour on feeding activity, but a significant increase in the use of cover at night and a decrease in the use of cover by day. While common bullies may recognize the presence of a predator through chemical cues, dark conditions may inhibit this and other sensory mechanisms, affecting their ability to recognize the proximity of a predator. For example, during the daytime they may rely on visual cues to initiate cover-seeking behavior, but in the dark, vision is impaired giving them less warning of predators, thus potentially making them more vulnerable

Author-supplied keywords

  • Chemical cues
  • Gobiomorphus cotidianus
  • Mysid
  • Perca fluviatilis
  • Predator cues
  • Sensory

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Jeffrey P. Vanderpham

  • Shinichi Nakagawa

  • Gerard P. Closs

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free