When differences become essential: Minority essentialism in response to majority treatment

  • Morton T
  • Postmes T
  • 81

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 30

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

among members of the sexual minority as it is among the members of the heterosexual majority. For instance, some gay and lesbian people appear to be enthusiastic about evidence for the biological origins of their identity. But there is also evidence for suspicion about these ideas within the same community (a debate summarized by Rosario, 1997). Thus, there is variability in the positions that people adopt regarding the origins of sexual identity, both within the majority and within the minority. The aim of the present research was to explore beliefs about sexuality from the perspective of sexual minorities. In so doing, we consider the more general theoretical ques-tions of when and why members of a stigmatized minority might embrace an essentialized view of their own identity. Previously, it has been suggested that minority endorse-ment of essentialist ideas might reflect desires to rationalize or justify the negative treatment they receive from the majority. In contrast, we argue that essentialism can be an aspect of identity expression—and that essentialist ideas might be endorsed as means to assert a valued identity in the face of a majority that denies it. We elaborate this perspective below.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Discrimination
  • Essentialism
  • Identity
  • Marginalization
  • Sexuality

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Thomas A. Morton

  • Tom Postmes

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free