Moderated regression analysis is commonly used to test for multiplicative influences of independent variables in regression models. D. Lubinski and L. G. Humphreys (1990) have shown that signifi- cant moderator effects can exist even when stronger quadratic effects are present. They recommend comparing effect sizes associated with both effect types and selecting the model that yields the strong- est effect. The authors show that this procedure of comparing effect sizes is biased in favor of the moderated model when multicollinearity is high because of the differential reliability of the qua- dratic and multiplicative terms in the regression models. Fortunately, levels of multicollinearity un- der which this bias is most problematic may be outside the range encountered in many empirical studies. The authors discuss causes and implications of this phenomenon as well as alternative pro- cedures for evaluating structural relationships among variables.
CITATION STYLE
MacCallum, R. C., & Mar, C. M. (1995). Distinguishing between moderator and quadratic effects in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 118(3), 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.405
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.