Earnings Trend and Performance Relative to Benchmarks: How Consistency Influences Their Joint Use

  • Koonce L
  • LIPE M
  • 77


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 16


    Citations of this article.


JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. ABSTRACT Archival research shows that the market reacts to earnings trend as well as to earnings performance relative to analysts' forecasts (i.e., benchmark per-formance) . We conduct four experiments to investigate how and why investors react to these two measures when both are available over multiple time peri-ods. Our results show that investors rely on an earnings measure only when it is consistent over time. When both measures are consistent over time, in-vestors use them in an additive fashion, suggesting that they view them as providing different information about the firm. Further tests show that in-vestors believe that earnings trend and benchmark performance both provide information about a firm's future prospects and management's credibility. Al-though judged future prospects fully explain the effect of earnings trend on investor judgments, neither judged future prospects nor management cred-ibility completely explains the effect of benchmark performance. Our study has implications for firm managers and researchers.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Lisa Koonce

  • Marlys Gascho LIPE

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free