East and West in Jewish nationalism: Conflicting types in the Zionist vision?

  • Conforti Y
  • 13


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 5


    Citations of this article.


This article analyses the ethnic and civic components of the early Zionist movement. The debate over whether Zionism was an Eastern-ethnic nationalist move- ment or a Western-civic movement began with the birth of Zionism. The article also investigates the conflict that broke out in 1902 surrounding the publication of Herzl’s utopian vision, Altneuland.AhadHa’am,aleader of Hibbat Zion and ‘Eastern’ cultural Zionism, sharply attacked Herzl’s ‘Western’ political Zionism, which he considered to be disconnected from the cultural foundations of historical Judaism. Instead, Ahad Ha’am supported the Eastern Zionist utopia of Elchanan Leib Lewinsky. Hans Kohn, a leading researcher of nationalism, distinguished between ‘Eastern’ and ‘Western’ nationalist movements. He argued that Herzl’s political heritage led the Zionistmovement to become an Eastern-ethnic nationalist movement. The debate over the character of Jewish nationalism – ethnic or civic – continues to engage researchers and remains a topic of public debate in Israel even today. As this article demonstrates, the debate between ‘Eastern’ and ‘Western’ Zionism has its foundations in the origins of the Zionist movement. A close look at the vision held by both groups challenges Kohn’s dichotomy as well as his understanding of the Zionist movement.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Ahad ha'am
  • East and West
  • Ethnic and civic
  • Hans Kohn
  • Israel
  • Nationalism
  • Teodor Herzl
  • Zionism

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Yitzhak Conforti

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free