Ecological forecasts

  • Daily G
  • 146

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 121

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Until the next big asteroid hits us, the future of life on Earth will depend much more on humanity than on anything else. Collectively, we have the power to wipe out most macroscopic species and to change radically the ecological and evolutionary playing fields of any that remain. Humanity exercises this power largely inadvertently, with consequences that increasingly threaten our well-being. What will happen from here on? Clues are being sought in the countryside, where in subtle but profound ways the possible futures of life are already unfolding. 'Countryside' refers to the growing fraction of the Earth's unbuilt land surface whose ecosystem qualities are strongly influenced by humanity. It includes agricultural plots; gardens and pasture; plantation or managed forest; and remnants of native vegetation in areas devoted primarily to human activities. The countryside offers a broad arena where the functioning and fates of species can be studied under alternative predicted futures. Yet surprisingly little is known about countryside biogeography, especially in rapidly changing tropical ecosystems. Initial studies and conservation efforts understandably focused on natural ecosystems and, more recently, on their remaining fragments. 'Island biogeography', a conceptual framework assuming islands of natural habitat surrounded by an inhospitable sea of agriculture and other development, informed much of the early work. Now, the 'sea' itself has become a focus of study as the fraction of the biosphere free from human influence is tiny and rapidly shrinking; and many countryside habitats are actually not so inhospitable. Three broad questions face us as wilderness fades away. First, assuming that human impacts intensify as currently projected, what sorts of species and ecosystems will exist over the coming decades and centuries? Second, what sorts do we want and how do we decide? And third, how, and to what extent, can we achieve our desires? (See Box 1.) Inspiring progress on all three questions has been made over the past two decades. New approaches and perspectives centre around building a science that will let us forecast changes both in biodiversity and in the way that ecosystems function. Many efforts aim to integrate ecology further with fields such as anthropology, climatology, economics, history and law to characterize the consequences to society of 'ecosystem change' and possible responses to it. There is great potential for biodiversity conservation, at least in the short term, in tropical countryside of 'low' to 'intermediate' intensity of use small plots and paddocks (say, 0.1 to 10 hectares), and scattered remnants of native vegetation (0.1 to 100 or 1,000 hectares). For instance, more than half of Costa Rica's native bird species occur in largely deforested countryside habitats, together with similar fractions of mammals and butterflies. Little is known about long-term survival of biotas, however; work in Kenya and elsewhere shows that the path to extinction can be many decades or centuries long. Europe, much of which has been 'countryside' for a long time, shows clearly that some farming landscapes retain more biodiversity and valuable ecosystem services than others. Much work is needed, and little time remains, to help steer a course that will at least protect the most vital of the Earth's life-support services. A three-pronged scientific effort is under way to serve this end. It has the daunting task of building models of ecosystem change, with emphasis on understanding the functional roles of species and ecosystems, especially in countryside. To preserve options, it must also develop more comprehensive strategies to conserve native biotas and their services on human-dominated lands, as well as in remaining 'natural' areas. Finally, there are interdisciplinary efforts to characterize the biophysical and socio-economic trade-offs associated with alternative regimes of land management and to inform farmers, foresters and society generally about policy options. Nothing less than life is at stake.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Gretchen C. Daily

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free