The economics of employer versus individual mandates

20Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper reviews the economic implications of employer and individual health insurance mandates. Although the cost of meeting an employer mandate is nominally paid by employers, in the long run much of the cost may be shifted backward to employees in the form of lower wages. We also compare the consequences of hypothetical employer and individual health insurance mandates for families with different income levels. Depending on their structure, an employer mandate may be more or less progressive than an individual mandate.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krueger, A. B., & Reinhardt, U. E. (1994). The economics of employer versus individual mandates. Health Affairs. Project HOPE. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.13.2.34

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free