Skip to content
Journal article

Educational outreach to promote screening for tuberculosis in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Griffiths C, Sturdy P, Brewin P, Bothamley G, Eldridge S, Martineau A, MacDonald M, Ramsay J, Tibrewal S, Levi S, Zumla A, Feder G ...see all

The Lancet, vol. 369, issue 9572 (2007) pp. 1528-1534

  • 5

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.
  • N/A

    Views

    ScienceDirect users who have downloaded this article.
Sign in to save reference

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Tuberculosis is re-emerging as an important health problem in industrialised countries. Uncertainty surrounds the effect of public-health control options. We therefore aimed to assess a programme to promote screening for tuberculosis in a UK primary health care district.

METHODS
In a cluster randomised controlled trial, we randomised 50 of 52 (96%) eligible general practices in Hackney, London, UK, to receive an outreach programme that promoted screening for tuberculosis in people registering in primary care, or to continue with usual care. Screening was verbal, and proceeded to tuberculin skin testing, if appropriate. The primary outcome was the proportion of new cases of active tuberculosis identified in primary care. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT00214708.

FINDINGS
Between June 1, 2002, and Oct 1, 2004, 44 986 and 48 984 patients registered with intervention and control practices, respectively. In intervention practices 57% (13 478 of 23 573) of people attending a registration health check were screened for tuberculosis compared with 0·4% (84 of 23 051) in control practices. Intervention practices showed increases in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis cases in primary care compared with control practices (66/141 [47%] vs 54/157 [34%], odds ratio (OR) 1·68, 95% CI 1·05–2·68, p=0·03). Intervention practices also had increases in diagnosis of latent tuberculosis (11/59 [19%] vs 5/68 [9%], OR 3·00, 0·98–9·20, p=0·055) and BCG coverage (mean BCG rate 26·8/1000 vs 3·8/1000, intervention rate ratio 9·52, 4·0–22·7, p
INTERPRETATION
Our educational intervention for promotion of screening for tuberculosis in primary care improved identification of active and latent tuberculosis, and increased BCG coverage. Yield from screening was low, but was augmented by improved case-finding. Screening programmes in primary care should be considered as part of tuberculosis control initiatives in industrialised countries.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Chris Griffiths

  • Pat Sturdy

  • Penny Brewin

  • Graham Bothamley

  • Sandra Eldridge

  • Adrian Martineau

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below