Effect of a quality improvement curriculum on resident knowledge and skills in improvement

  • Vinci L
  • Oyler J
  • Johnson J
 et al. 
  • 39


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 27


    Citations of this article.


BACKGROUND: While many residency programmes have implemented quality improvement (QI) training programmes, few have been rigorously evaluated. METHODS: Residents at the authors' institution participated in a required course, the Quality Assessment and Improvement Curriculum during two 1-month-long rotations. The American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Practice Improvement Module (PIM) was used to guide residents through chart reviews for quality measures, surveys of patient satisfaction and an assessment of clinic systems. Residents received 12 h of training in QI skills (ie, using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles). Residents worked in groups to test the effect of a small QI project of their choosing. Residents completed the Quality Improvement Knowledge Assessment Tool (QIKAT) to assess QI knowledge, and a self assessment of QI skills. Third-year residents who did not participate in the curriculum served as a historical control group. RESULTS: 87% (26/30) of PGY2s (intervention group) and 83% (24/29) of PGY3 residents (historical controls) completed the self assessment and QIKAT. PGY2 residents showed a significant improvement in QIKAT scores (Pre: 6.98 (6.23 to 7.72) vs Post: 9.70 (8.92 to 10.50); p

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Lisa M. Vinci

  • Julie Oyler

  • Julie K. Johnson

  • Vineet M. Arora

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free