Effect of test interruptions on blood lactate during constant workload testing

64Citations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether repetitive test interruptions (TI) during constant load testing influence blood lactate concentration (BLC), maximal lactate steady state (MLSS), MLSS, workload (P-MLSS), and relative MLSS intensity (Int-MLSS). Methods: Nineteen males participated in this study. In experiment A, 1.0 subjects (27.5 ± 2.9 yr; 183.7 ± 5.2 cm; 77.4 ± 3.7 kg) performed 30-min constant load tests: one without TI, one with TI of 30 s, and one with TI of 90 s after every 5 min of cycling at a given workload. In experiment B, nine subjects (28.0 ± 2.7 yr; 182.9 ± 6.8 cm; 76.2 ± 4.5 kg) performed 30-min constant load tests at different workloads until MLSS had been determined for all three TI protocols. Results: In experiment A, the BLC after 30 min net working time (BLC30) was higher (P < 0.001) without TI (6.0 ± 1.3 mmol·L-1) than with TI of 30 s (4.9 * 1.4 mmol·L-1) or 90 s (4.5 ± 1.1 mmol·L-1). The change in BLC during the final 20 min (ΔBLC10-30, was greater (P < 0.01) without TI (1.2 ± 1.0 mmol·L-1) than with TI of 30 s (0.2 ± 0.7 mmol·L-1) or 90 s (-0.3 ± 0.7 mmol·L -1). In experiment B, the MLSS was not affected, but P-MLSS and Int-MLSS were lower (P < 0.01) without TI (277.8 ± 24.4W and 73.7 ± 7.6%) than with TI of 30 s (300.4 ± 30.4W and 79.2 ± 8.0%) or 90 s (310.0 ± 31.2W and 81.5 ± 7.1%). Approximately 35% of the variance of BLC30 and ΔBLC10-30, and 70% of the variance of P-MLSS and Int-MLSS were explained by TI duration (P < 0.001). Conclusions: TI decreased BLC30 and ΔBLC 10-30 but has no effect on MLSS. Consequently, with TI, the MLSS is achieve(at higher P-MLSS and Int-MLSS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beneke, R., Hütler, M., Von Duvillard, S. P., Sellens, M., & Leithäuser, R. M. (2003). Effect of test interruptions on blood lactate during constant workload testing. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 35(9), 1626–1630. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000084520.80451.D5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free