Efficiency in data gathering: Set size effects in the selection task

  • Nickerson R
  • 1

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted with variants of Wason�s (1966) selection

task. The common focus was the effect of differences in the sizes
of the sets

represented by P and not-Q in assertions of the form If P then Q (conditional)

or All P are Q (categorical). Results support the conclusion that
such set size

differences affect the strategies people adopt when asked to determine,

efficiently, the truth or falsity of such assertions, but they do
not entirely

negate the tendency to select the term represented by P (the antecedent
of the

conditional or the subject of the categorical) in preference to the
term

represented by not-Q (the complement of the consequent of the conditional
or

the complement of the predicate of the categorical). Several possible

explanations of this perseverance are considered. Results also support
the

conclusion that people find it easier to assess categorical assertions
than

logically equivalent conditional assertions.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

There are no full text links

Authors

  • R S Nickerson

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free