Endotracheal suctioning: an example of the problems of relevance and rigour in clinical research

  • Wainwright, S. & Gould D
  • 7


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 11


    Citations of this article.


Endotracheal suctioning is a routine but potentially dangerous procedure. The literature documenting approaches to minimizing the cardiopulmonary complications of endotracheal suctioning is reviewed. Hyperoxygenation, hyperventilation, hyperinflation and the use of adaptors are all evaluated. The effects of endotracheal suctioning on haemodynamics and oxygen transport are also examined. The traditional dualist approach to the respiratory and cardiovascular systems is contrasted with the recent emphasis on oxygen transport by the cardiopulmonary system. The trade-off between the rigour of laboratory studies (which can be well controlled but are difficult to generalize) and the relevance of clinical research (which is more easily generalized but which often lacks internal validity) is discussed. Although research studies have become both more methodologically and conceptually sophisticated, definitive recommendations for a safe and effective suctioning procedure still remain elusive.

Author-supplied keywords

  • 1984
  • 1988
  • 2 and 3
  • carroll
  • clinical research
  • complications
  • devel-
  • endotracheal suctioning
  • fuchs
  • ommend protocols for ets
  • oped to minimize these
  • research application
  • see tables 1
  • several authors rec-
  • various techniques have been

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • D. Wainwright, S. & Gould

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free