Enterobacteriaceae In Beef Products From Retail Outlets in Alexandria

  • El-Gendy N
  • Ibrahim H
  • Al-Shabasy N
  • et al.
ISSN: 1110-2047
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the presence of Enterobacteriaceae in beef products as Enterobacteriaceae, luncheon, pasterma, frankfurter and minced meat as these microbes are considered as major E.coli, Salmonellae, cause of foodborne illness.A total of 100 samples (25 of each beef product) were collected Yersinia from different retail outlets. Each sample was kept in a separate sterile plastic bag and enterocolitica, beef transferred in an ice box to the laboratory under complete aseptic conditions with a minimum products of delay. All collected samples were bacteriologically examined for isolation and identification of Enterobacteriaceae. We found that the most important bacteria that isolated from minced meat were E. coli (44 %), Enterobacter spp. Especially Enterobacter aerogenes (12 %), Enterobacter intermedium (4) and Enterobacter gergoviae (4 %), Citrobacter spp. that includes Citrobacter amalonaticus (4 %), Citrobacter diversus (4 %) and Citrobacter freundii (4 %), serratia spp especially Serratia marcescens 8 %), Serratia ficaria (8 %), Serratia fonticola (12 %), Serratia liquefaciens (4 %) and Serratia rubidaea (8 %), Edwardsiella spp. especially Edwardsiella ictalori (8 %) and Edwardsiella hoshinae (12 %), Povidencia spp. (8 %) especially Providencia alcalifciens (4 %), Klebsiella pneumoniae especially Subsp. Ozanae (4 %) and Proteus spp. especially Proteus mirabilis (16 %). The most important bacteria that isolated from luncheon were E. coli (32 %), Enterobacter spp. Especially Enterobacter aerogenes (8 %), Enterobacter intermedium (4 %) and Enterobacter gergoviae (8 %), Citrobacter spp. that includes Citrobacter amalonaticus (12 %), Citrobacter diversus (4 %) and Citrobacter freundii (16 %), Serratia spp. especially Serratia marcescens (8 %), Serratia ficaria (12 %), Serratia fonticola (4 %), Srratia liquefaciens (4 %) and Serratia rubidaea (8 %), Edwardsiella spp. especially Edwardsiella ictalori (8 %) and Edwardsiella hoshinae (16 %), Providencia spp. especially Providencia alcalifciens (4 %), Klebsiella pneumoniae especially Subsp. Ozanae (12 %) and Proteus spp. especially Proteus mirabilis (8 %). Also,the most important bacteria that isolated from pasterma were E. coli (40 %), Enterobacter spp. Especially Enterobacter aerogenes (8 %), Enterobacter intermedium (4 %) and Enterobacter gergoviae (12 %), Citrobacter spp. that includes Citrobacter amalonaticus (4 %), Citrobacter diversus (12 %) and Citrobacter freundii (4 %), Serratia spp. especially Srratia marcescens (4 %), Serratia ficaria (8 %), Serratia fonticola (4 %), Serratia liquefaciens (4 %) and Serratia rubidaea (8 %), Edwardsiella spp. especially Edwardsiella ictalori (12 %) and Edwardsiella hoshinae (8 %), providencia spp. especially providencia alcalifciens (8 %), Klebsiella pneumoniae especially subsp. Ozanae (8 %) and Proteus spp. especially Poteus mirabilis (12 %). Eventually,the most important bacteria that isolated from frankfurter were E. coli (36 %), Enterobacter spp. Especially enterobacter aerogenes (4 %), enterobacter intermedium (4 %) and enterobacter gergoviae (8 %), Citrobacter spp. that includes Citrobacter amalonaticus (8 %), Citrobacter diversus (4 %) and Citrobacter freundii (4 %), Serratia spp. especially Serratia marcescens (4 %), Serratia ficaria (12 %), Serratia fonticola (4 %), Serratia liquefaciens (4 %) and Serratia rubidaea (4 %), Edwardsiella spp. especially edwardsiella ictalori (8 %) and Edwardsiella hoshinae (12 %), providencia spp. especially Providencia alcalifciens (4 %), Klebsiella pneumoniae especially subsp. Ozanae (8 %) and Proteus spp. especially Proteus mirabilis (8 %).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

El-Gendy, N. M., Ibrahim, H. A., Al-Shabasy, N. A., & Samaha, I. A. (2014). Enterobacteriaceae In Beef Products From Retail Outlets in Alexandria. Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 41, 80–86. Retrieved from http://www.scopemed.org/?mno=151171

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free